• Radojka Jokšić-Mazinjanin, Nikolina Marić, Aleksandar Đuričin, Zoran Gojković, Velibor Vasović, Goran Rakić, Milena Jokšić-Zelić, and Siniša Saravolac.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
• Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 15; 59 (5).

IntroductionTrauma scoring systems in prehospital settings are supposed to ensure the most appropriate in-hospital treatment of the injured.Aim Of The StudyTo determine the sensitivity and specificity of the CRAMS scale (circulation, respiration, abdomen, motor and speech), RTS score (revised trauma score), MGAP (mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, age, arterial pressure) and GAP (Glasgow Coma Scale, age, arterial pressure) scoring systems in prehospital settings in order to evaluate trauma severity and to predict the outcome.Materials And MethodsA prospective, observational study was conducted. For every trauma patient, a questionnaire was initially filled in by a prehospital doctor and these data were subsequently collected by the hospital.ResultsThe study included 307 trauma patients with an average age of 51.7 ± 20.9. Based on the ISS (injury severity score), severe trauma was diagnosed in 50 (16.3%) patients. MGAP had the best sensitivity/specificity ratio when the obtained values indicated severe trauma. The sensitivity and specificity were 93.4 and 62.0%, respectively, for an MGAP value of 22. MGAP and GAP were strongly correlated with each other and were statistically significant in predicting the outcome of treatment (OR 2.23; 95% Cl 1.06-4.70; p = 0.035). With a rise of one in the MGAP score value, the probability of survival increases 2.2 times.ConclusionMGAP and GAP, in prehospital settings, had higher sensitivity and specificity when identifying patients with a severe trauma and predicting an unfavorable outcome than other scoring systems.

16 keywords...

hide…