• Spine · May 2024

    Patient-reported Outcome after Surgical Evacuation of Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematomas at One-year Follow-up.

    • Fredrik Nerelius, Freyr G Sigmundsson, Niklas Karlén, Per Wretenberg, and Anders Joelson.
    • Department of Orthopaedics, Orebro University School of Medical Sciences and Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden.
    • Spine. 2024 May 15; 49 (10): 701707701-707.

    Study DesignRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the National Swedish Spine Register (Swespine).ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH) requiring reoperation on one-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a large cohort of patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis.Summary Of Background DataStudies exploring the outcomes of reoperations after SSEH are scarce and often lack validated outcome measures. As SSEH is considered a serious complication, understanding of the outcome after hematoma evacuation is important.Materials And MethodsAfter retrieving data from 2007 to 2017 from Swespine, we included all patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without concomitant spondylolisthesis who were treated surgically with decompression without fusion. Patients with evacuated SSEH were identified in the registry. Back/leg pain numerical rating scales (NRSs), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale were used for the outcome assessment. PROMs before and one year after decompression surgery were compared between evacuated patients and all other patients. Multivariate linear regression was performed to determine whether hematoma evacuation predicted inferior one-year PROM scores.ResultsA total of 113 patients with an evacuated SSEH were compared with 19527 patients with no evacuation. One-year after decompression surgery, both groups showed significant improvement in all PROMs. When comparing the two groups' one-year improvement, there were no significant differences in any PROM. The proportion of patients achieving the minimum important change was not significantly different for any PROM. Multivariate linear regression found that hematoma evacuation significantly predicted inferior one-year ODI (β=4.35, P =0.043), but it was not a significant predictor of inferior NRS Back (β=0.50, P =0.105), NRS Leg (β=0.41, P =0.221), or EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (β=-1.97, P =0.470).ConclusionsA surgically evacuated SSEH does not affect the outcome in terms of back/leg pain or health-related quality of life. Commonly used PROM surveys may not capture neurological deficits associated with SSEH.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…