• Peter G Passias, Tyler K Williamson, Rachel Joujon-Roche, Oscar Krol, Peter Tretiakov, Bailey Imbo, Andrew J Schoenfeld, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Jordan Lebovic, Jamshaid Mir, Pooja Dave, Kimberly McFarland, Shaleen Vira, Bassel G Diebo, Paul Park, Dean Chou, Justin S Smith, Renaud Lafage, and Virginie Lafage.
• Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY.
• Spine. 2024 Mar 15; 49 (6): E72E78E72-E78.

Study Design/SettingRetrospective.ObjectiveEvaluate the surgical technique that has the greatest influence on the rate of junctional failure following ASD surgery.Summary Of Background DataDiffering presentations of adult spinal deformity(ASD) may influence the extent of surgical intervention and the use of prophylaxis at the base or the summit of a fusion construct to influence junctional failure rates.Materials And MethodsASD patients with two-year(2Y) data and at least 5-level fusion to the pelvis were included. Patients were divided based on UIV: [Longer Construct: T1-T4; Shorter Construct: T8-T12]. Parameters assessed included matching in age-adjusted PI-LL or PT, aligning in GAP-relative pelvic version or Lordosis Distribution Index. After assessing all lumbopelvic radiographic parameters, the combination of realigning the two parameters with the greatest minimizing effect of PJF constituted a good base. Good s was defined as having: (1) prophylaxis at UIV (tethers, hooks, cement), (2) no lordotic change(under-contouring) greater than 10° of the UIV, (3) preoperative UIV inclination angle<30°. Multivariable regression analysis assessed the effects of junction characteristics and radiographic correction individually and collectively on the development of PJK and PJF in differing construct lengths, adjusting for confounders.ResultsIn all, 261 patients were included. The cohort had lower odds of PJK(OR: 0.5,[0.2-0.9]; P =0.044) and PJF was less likely (OR: 0.1,[0.0-0.7]; P =0.014) in the presence of a good summit. Normalizing pelvic compensation had the greatest radiographic effect on preventing PJF overall (OR: 0.6,[0.3-1.0]; P =0.044). In shorter constructs, realignment had a greater effect on decreasing the odds of PJF(OR: 0.2,[0.02-0.9]; P =0.036). With longer constructs, a good summit lowered the likelihood of PJK(OR: 0.3,[0.1-0.9]; P =0.027). A good base led to zero occurrences of PJF. In patients with severe frailty/osteoporosis, a good summit lowered the incidence of PJK(OR: 0.4,[0.2-0.9]; P =0.041) and PJF (OR: 0.1,[0.01-0.99]; P =0.049).ConclusionTo mitigate junctional failure, our study demonstrated the utility of individualizing surgical approaches to emphasize an optimal basal construct. Achievement of tailored goals at the cranial end of the surgical construct may be equally important, especially for higher-risk patients with longer fusions.Level Of Evidence3.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

26 keywords...

hide…