• Spine · Apr 2009

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of the flat torso versus the elevated torso shoulder pad removal techniques in a cadaveric cervical spine instability model.

    • MaryBeth Horodyski, Christian P DiPaola, Matthew J DiPaola, Bryan P Conrad, Gianluca Del Rossi, and Glenn R Rechtine.
    • Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA. horodmb@ortho.ufl.edu
    • Spine. 2009 Apr 1;34(7):687-91.

    Study DesignControlled laboratory study in a cadaveric model.ObjectiveTo determine if removing shoulder pads using the elevated torso technique generated less spinal segment motion than using the flat torso method.Summary Of Background DataGuidelines for care of the injured football player with a suspected spinal injury recommend initial immobilization with shoulder pads and helmet in place. There is a need to develop a safe protocol, for shoulder pad removal that maintains optimum cervical stability.MethodsFive lightly embalmed cadavers were studied before and after a globally unstable segment was created at C5-C6. A trained group of medical staff conducted repeated measures trials for 2 pad removal protocols. The elevated torso technique, outlined by the NATA Inter-Association Task Force, is the same as the flat torso except an additional assistant is employed to lift the patient's shoulders 30 degrees to 40 degrees off the ground while the head holder maintains spinal alignment as the pads are removed. An electromagnetic tracking device captured angular and linear motions in 3 planes between the C5-C6 segments.ResultsThe elevated torso technique generated significantly less C5-C6 motion in flexion/extension (P = 0.015) and lateral bending (P = 0.001), with a trend toward decreased cervical motion in axial rotation (P = 0.052). When moving the spine-injured cadavers, linear translation was also slightly, but not significantly less when the elevated torso technique was used. In the intact spine, significantly less motion was seen in 5 of 6 measures when the elevated torso technique was used. However, the differences were not large enough to be clinically significant in an intact spine.ConclusionThese findings support use of the elevated torso method to minimize cervical spine motion during shoulder pad removal when neither thoracic nor lumbar spinal injury is a concern.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…