• Rintaro Miyo, Koichiro Yasaka, Akiyoshi Hamada, Naoya Sakamoto, Reina Hosoi, Masumi Mizuki, and Osamu Abe.
• Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 9; 102 (23): e33910e33910.

AbstractTo compare the quality and interobserver agreement in the evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) on computed tomography (CT) images between deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (hybrid IR). This retrospective study included 30 patients (age, 71.5 ± 12.5 years; 20 men) who underwent unenhanced lumbar CT. Axial and sagittal CT images were reconstructed using hybrid IR and DLR. In the quantitative analysis, a radiologist placed regions of interest within the aorta and recorded the standard deviation of the CT attenuation (i.e., quantitative image noise). In the qualitative analysis, 2 other blinded radiologists evaluated the subjective image noise, depictions of structures, overall image quality, and degree of LSS. The quantitative image noise in DLR (14.8 ± 1.9/14.2 ± 1.8 in axial/sagittal images) was significantly lower than that in hybrid IR (21.4 ± 4.4/20.6 ± 4.0) (P < .0001 for both, paired t test). Subjective image noise, depictions of structures, and overall image quality were significantly better with DLR than with hybrid IR (P < .006, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Interobserver agreements in the evaluation of LSS (with 95% confidence interval) were 0.732 (0.712-0.751) and 0.794 (0.781-0.807) for hybrid IR and DLR, respectively. DLR provided images with improved quality and higher interobserver agreement in the evaluation of LSS in lumbar CT than hybrid IR.Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

22 keywords...

hide…