• Chantal Young, Katherine Daly, Alicia Hurtado, Amelia Phillips, Jeffrey Woods, Jennifer Caceres, and Wei Wei Lee.
• Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct 1; 38 (13): 304730503047-3050.

AbstractThe Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) requires that well-being programs must be "effective." Yet most medical schools do not robustly assess their well-being programs. Most evaluate their programs using one question on the Association of American Medical College's annual Graduation Questionnaire (AAMC GQ) survey for fourth-year students on their satisfaction with well-being programs, which is inadequate and nonspecific and only assesses a specific time in training. In this perspective, we, as members of the AAMC Group on Student Affairs (GSA) - Committee on Student Affairs (COSA) Working Group on Medical Student Well-being, suggest adapting Kern's 6-step approach to curriculum development as an effective framework to guide the development and evaluation of well-being programs. We suggest strategies for applying Kern's steps to well-being programs, with attention to conducting needs assessments, identifying goals, implementation, and evaluation and feedback. While each institution will have unique goals emerging from their needs assessment, we put forth five common medical student well-being goals as examples. Applying a rigorous and structured approach to developing and evaluating undergraduate medical education well-being programs will involve defining a guiding philosophy and clear goals and implementing a strong assessment strategy. This Kern-based framework can help schools meaningfully assess the impact of their initiatives on student well-being.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

20 keywords...

hide…