• John Ciarletta, Denise Lillvis, Anne Stoklosa, Benjamin Kasper, and Kathryn Bass.
• Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
• Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Jan 1; 28 (2): 282290282-290.

ObjectiveThe National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued guidelines on the safe transport of pediatric patients to lessen the chance of injury during ambulance transport. However, adherence to these standards have been slow to take hold. The objective of this quality improvement study is to evaluate barriers and facilitators of safe transport at the individual, organizational, and societal levels and identify improvement opportunities in the safe transport of pediatric patients.MethodsThis study was designed using an implementation science framework. Six focus groups were held with EMS clinicians to assess knowledge, behaviors, barriers, and facilitators of safe pediatric transport. Four interviews were conducted with EMS leadership to characterize organizational safe transport practices and policies. Detailed notes were taken during focus groups; interviews were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach where team members reviewed transcripts using an established framework and identified major and minor themes related to safe pediatric transport.ResultsThree focus groups were conducted in a hospital setting and three were conducted at EMS base stations. Interview participants included two paramedic leaders, an ambulance service chief executive officer, and an ambulance service clinical coordinator. Recurring themes included the belief that children were inherently difficult to transport, the sentiment that training in pediatric transport is lacking, and the acknowledgement that familiarity with pediatric transport guidelines is low. Additionally, a major theme was that situational practicality can take precedence over adherence to best practice recommendations. Participants reported the presence of organizational and external barriers that made it more difficult for EMS personnel to follow safety guidelines. This included equipment unavailability, lack of clear policies, low pediatric patient volume, manufacturer design preferences, and prevailing EMS culture/norms.ConclusionEMS clinicians need hands-on training and knowledge reinforcement in safe pediatric ground ambulance transport. EMS agencies should ensure that their crews have proper equipment, training, and protocols in place. Regulators and manufacturers can be catalysts for the implementation of these recommendations. Substantial change at the individual, organizational, and societal levels are needed to improve the safety of pediatric patients being transported via ground ambulance.

13 keywords...

hide…