• Jakob Labus, André Foit, Oliver Mehler, Parwis Rahmanian, Thorsten Wahlers, Bernd W Böttiger, Wolfgang A Wetsch, and Alexander Mathes.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: jakob.labus@uk-koeln.de.
• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2023 Oct 1; 37 (10): 191219211912-1921.

ObjectivesLeft ventricular (LV) longitudinal function is reduced after on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), while global LV function often is preserved. There are only limited data on the underlying compensatory mechanism. Therefore, the authors aimed to describe intraoperative changes of LV contractile pattern by myocardial strain analysis.DesignA prospective observational study.SettingAt a single university hospital.ParticipantsA total of 30 patients scheduled for isolated on-pump CABG with an uneventful intraoperative course and preoperative preserved LV and RV function, sinus rhythm, without more-than-mild heart valve disease, or elevated pulmonary pressure.InterventionsTransesophageal echocardiography was performed after induction of anesthesia (T1), after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2), and after sternal closure (T3). Echocardiographic evaluation was performed under stable hemodynamics, in sinus rhythm or atrial pacing, and vasopressor support with norepinephrine ≤0.1 µg/kg/min.Measurements And Main ResultsEchoPAC v204 software (GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Norway) was used for analysis of 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) LV ejection fraction (EF), LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), LV global circumferential strain (GCS), LV global radial strain (GRS), LV apical rotation (aRot), LV basal rotation (bRot), and LV twist. Strain analysis was feasible in all included patients after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2). Although there were no significant differences in the values of conventional echocardiographic parameters during the intraoperative interval, GLS deteriorated significantly after CABG compared to pre-bypass assessment (T1 v T2, -13.4% ± 2.9 v -11.8% ± 2.9; p = 0.007). GCS improved significantly after surgery (T1 v T2, -19.4% (IQR -17.1% to -21.2%) v -22.8% (IQR -21.1% to -24.7%); p < 0.001) as well as aRot (T1 v T2, -9.7° (IQR -7.1° to -14.1°) v -14.5° (IQR -12.1° to -17.1°); p < 0.001), bRot (T1 v T2, 5.1° (IQR 3.8°-6.7°) v 7.2° (IQR 5.6°-8.2°); p = 0.02), and twist (T1 v T2, 15.8° (IQR 11.7°-19.4°) v 21.6° (IQR 19.2°-25.1°); p < 0.001), while GRS remained unchanged. There were no significant changes in the values of GLS, GCS, GRS, aRot, bRot, or twist, as well as in the values of 2D and 3D LV EF before and after sternal closure (T2 v T3).ConclusionBeyond evaluation of longitudinal LV strain, measurements of circumferential and radial strain, as well as LV rotation and twist mechanics, were feasible in the intraoperative course of this study. Reduction of longitudinal function after on-pump CABG was compensated intraoperatively by improvement of GCS and rotation in the authors' group of patients. Perioperative assessment of GCS, GRS, as well as rotation and twist, might provide deeper insight into perioperative changes of cardiac mechanics.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

19 keywords...

hide…