• Hsin-Ju Han, Ching-Shui Huang, Tzu-Pin Lu, Ling-Ming Tseng, Wei-Chu Chie, and Chi-Cheng Huang.
• Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
• J Formos Med Assoc. 2024 Jan 1; 123 (1): 788778-87.

AbstractPeriodic mammography and/or sonography examinations are conducted across numerous hospitals nationalwidely, especially for antedees with a positive mammography screening. Despite the regular practice, clinical efficacy of hospital-based breast cancer surveillance remains unclear. Specifically, the impact of surveillance interval upon survival and prognostic surrogates stratified by menopausal status, as well as malignant transition rate should be deciphered. We retrieved cancer registry to ascertain 841 breast cancers with surveillance history through administration data. Healthy controls underwent breast surveillance and were concurrently free of cancer. More benign diseases rather than cancers were identified from premenopausal women (age ≤50 years) with sonography alone within one year, as well as older women (age >50) with both mammography and sonography one to two years before a cancer or benign diagnosis. Among breast cancers, mammography alone during the antecedent one to two years had a protective effect for diagnosing carcinoma in situ rather than invasive cancer (age-adjusted odds ratio: 0.048, P = 0.016). Three-state time homogeneous Markov model showed that hospital-based breast surveillance within 2 years of disease onset reduced the malignant transition rate by 65.16% (59.79-76.74%). The clinical efficacy of breast cancer surveillance was evidenced.Copyright © 2023 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

18 keywords...

hide…