• J Gen Intern Med · Jan 2024

    Reducing Overuse of 3-Day Repeat Type and Screen Testing across an 11-Hospital Safety Net System.

    • Dawi Shin, Hyung J Cho, Surafel Tsega, Daniel Alaiev, Joseph Talledo, Komal Chandra, ManchegoPeter AlarconPADepartment of Quality and Safety, NYC Health + Hospitals, New York, NY, USA.Department of Pediatrics, NYC Health + Hospitals/Kings County, New York, NY, USA., Milana Zaurova, Mariely Garcia, Jessica Jacobson, and Mona Krouss.
    • Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
    • J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jan 1; 39 (1): 131813-18.

    BackgroundAccording to the American Association of Blood Banks, a Type and Screen (T&S) is valid for up to three calendar days. Beyond a limited number of clinical indications such as a transfusion reaction, repeat T&S testing within 3 days is not warranted. Inappropriate repeat T&S testing is a costly medical waste and can lead to patient harm.ObjectiveTo reduce inappropriate duplicate T&S testing across a large, multihospital setting.SettingThe largest urban safety net health system in the USA, with 11 acute care hospitals.InterventionsOur first intervention involved adding the time elapsed since the last T&S order into the order and the process instructions that described when a T&S was indicated. The second intervention was a best practice advisory that triggered when T&S was ordered before the expiration of an active T&S.Main MeasuresThe primary outcome measure was the number of duplicate inpatient T&S per 1000 patient days.Key ResultsAcross all hospitals, the weekly average rate of duplicate T&S ordering decreased from 8.42 to 7.37 per 1000 patient days (12.5% reduction, p < 0.001) after the first intervention and to 4.32 per 1000 patient days (48.7% reduction, p < 0.001) after the second intervention. Using linear regression to compare pre-intervention to post-intervention 1, the level difference was - 2.46 (9.17 to 6.70, p < 0.001) and slope difference was 0.0001 (0.0282 to 0.0283, p = 1). For post-intervention 1 to post-intervention 2, the level difference was - 3.49 (8.06 to 4.58, p < 0.001) and slope difference was - 0.0428 (0.0283 to - 0.0145, p < 0.05).ConclusionsOur intervention successfully reduced duplicate T&S testing using a two-pronged electronic health record intervention. The success of this low effort intervention across a diverse health system provides a framework for similar interventions in various clinical settings.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.