• Sebastian Greppmair, Alexander Brinkmann, Anka Roehr, Otto Frey, Stefan Hagel, Christoph Dorn, Amélie Marsot, Ibrahim El-Haffaf, Michael Zoller, Thomas Saller, Johannes Zander, Lea Marie Schatz, Christina Scharf, Josef Briegel, Iris K Minichmayr, Sebastian G Wicha, and Uwe Liebchen.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
• Intensive Care Med. 2023 Aug 1; 49 (8): 966976966-976.

PurposeInadequate piperacillin (PIP) exposure in intensive care unit (ICU) patients threatens therapeutic success. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) might be promising to individualize dosing; however, the transferability of published models to external populations is uncertain. This study aimed to externally evaluate the available PIP population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models.MethodsA multicenter dataset of 561 ICU patients (11 centers/3654 concentrations) was used for the evaluation of 24 identified models. Model performance was investigated for a priori (A) predictions, i.e., considering dosing records and patient characteristics only, and for Bayesian forecasting, i.e., additionally including the first (B1) or first and second (B2) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) samples per patient. Median relative prediction error (MPE) [%] and median absolute relative prediction error (MAPE) [%] were calculated to quantify accuracy and precision.ResultsThe evaluation revealed a large inter-model variability (A: MPE - 135.6-78.3% and MAPE 35.7-135.6%). Integration of TDM data improved all model predictions (B1/B2 relative improvement vs. A: |MPE|median_all_models 45.1/67.5%; MAPEmedian_all_models 29/39%). The model by Kim et al. was identified to be most appropriate for the total dataset (A/B1/B2: MPE - 9.8/- 5.9/- 0.9%; MAPE 37/27.3/23.7%), Udy et al. performed best in patients receiving intermittent infusion, and Klastrup et al. best predicted patients receiving continuous infusion. Additional evaluations stratified by sex and renal replacement therapy revealed further promising models.ConclusionThe predictive performance of published PIP models in ICU patients varied considerably, highlighting the relevance of appropriate model selection for MIPD. Our differentiated external evaluation identified specific models suitable for clinical use, especially in combination with TDM.© 2023. The Author(s).

13 keywords...

hide…