• Br J Gen Pract · Jul 2023

    Adoption and Use of the NHS App in England: a mixed-methods evaluation.

    • Sukriti Kc, Claire Reidy, Anthony A Laverty, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, John Powell, Salina Tewolde, Céire Costelloe, Bernard Gudgin, and Felix Greaves.
    • Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public health, Imperial College London.
    • Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jul 1; 73 (suppl 1).

    BackgroundThe NHS App was launched as a 'front door' to digitally enabled health services, offering a range of services including appointment booking and ordering prescriptions. The extent of App use and its impacts on digital inclusion is under-explored.AimTo evaluate patterns of App uptake and adoption among different population groups.MethodInterrupted time series analyses explored aggregate monthly App usage from January 2019 - May 2021. Regression model assessed differences in App registration by markers of GP level socio-demographic variables. Qualitative interviews and focus groups involving 83 participants were conducted and analysed thematically.ResultsThere were 8,524,882 App downloads and 4,449,869 registrations. Negative binomial models found 25% less registrations in the most deprived practices (P <0.001) and 44% more registrations in the largest practices (P<0.001). Registration was 36% more in practices with the highest percentage of White patients (P <0.001) and 23% more in practices with highest percentage of 15-34-year-olds (P <0.001). In contrast, App registration was 13% less in practices with highest percentage of males (P <0.001) and 2% less in those with highest percentage of people with long-term care needs (P <0.001). Qualitative evaluation found that the App was not perceived as relevant or accessible for all and there are important cultural considerations (for example, language barriers and some restrictions in symptom checking for non-White skin). However, it can enable patients to hold services accountable.ConclusionThere is high uptake of the NHS App but there are differences in adoption rates among different population groups and issues of relevance and accessibility, that warrant further work.© British Journal of General Practice 2023.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.