• Ali Saif R Khan, Tobias A Mattei, Phillipe J Mercier, Michael Cloney, Nader S Dahdaleh, Tyler R Koski, and Najib E El Tecle.
• Center School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
• World Neurosurg. 2023 Nov 1; 179: 889888-98.

AbstractThe general objectives of spine surgery are to alleviate pain, restore neurologic function, and prevent or treat spinal deformities or instability. The accumulating expanse of outcome measures has allowed us to more objectively quantify these variables and, therefore, gauge the success of treatments, ultimately improving the quality of the delivered health care. It has become increasingly evident that spinal conditions and their accompanying interventions affect all aspects of a patient's life, including their physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being. This underscores the challenge of creating clinically relevant and accurate outcome measures in spine care, and the reason why there is a growing recognition of the importance of subjective measures such as patient-reported outcome measures, that consider a patients' health-related quality of life. Subjective measures provide valuable insights into patient experiences and perceptions of treatment outcomes, whereas objective measures provide a reproducible glimpse into key radiographic and clinical parameters that are associated with a successful outcome. In this narrative review, we provide a detailed analysis of the most common subjective and objective outcome measures employed in spine surgery, with a special focus on their current role as well as the possible future of outcome reporting.Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

28 keywords...

hide…