• Laura Cottey, Thomas Alexander Gerrard Shanahan, Toto Gronlund, Caroline Whiting, Moses Sokunbi, Simon David Carley, Jason E Smith, and James Lind Alliance (JLA) Emergency Medicine (EM) Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) Refresh Steering Group.
• Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK laurajcottey@gmail.com.
• Emerg Med J. 2023 Sep 1; 40 (9): 666670666-670.

BackgroundThe priorities for UK emergency medicine research were defined in 2017 by a priority setting partnership coordinated by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine in collaboration with the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Much has changed in the last 5 years, not least a global infectious disease pandemic and a significant worsening of the crisis in the urgent and emergency care system. Our aim was to review and refresh the emergency medicine research priorities.MethodsA steering group including patients, carers and healthcare professionals was established to agree to the methodology of the refresh. An independent adviser from the JLA chaired the steering group. The scope was adult patients in the ED. New questions were invited via an open call using multiple communications methods ensuring that patients, carers and healthcare professionals had the opportunity to contribute. Questions underwent minisystematic (BestBETs) review to determine if the question had been answered, and the original 2017 priorities were reviewed. Any questions that remained unanswered were included in an interim prioritisation survey, which was distributed to patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Rankings from this survey were reviewed by the steering group and a shortlist of questions put forward to the final workshop, which was held to discuss and rank the research questions in order of priority.Results77 new questions were submitted, of which 58 underwent mini-systematic review. After this process, 49 questions (of which 32 were new, 11 were related to original priorities and 6 unanswered original priorities were carried forward) were reviewed by the steering group and included in an interim prioritisation survey. The interim prioritisation survey attracted 276 individual responses. 26 questions were shortlisted for discussion at the final prioritisation workshop, where the top 10 research priorities were agreed.ConclusionWe have redefined the priorities for emergency medicine research in the UK using robust and established methodology, which will inform the agenda for the coming years.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

12 keywords...

hide…