• Annals of surgery · May 2024

    Multicenter Study

    Minimum and Optimal CA19-9 Response After Two Months Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Nationwide Multicenter Study.

    • Leonard W F Seelen, Deesje Doppenberg, Thomas F Stoop, Anne Nagelhout, Lilly J H Brada, Koop Bosscha, Olivier R Busch, Geert A Cirkel, Marcel den Dulk, Freek Daams, Susan van Dieren, van EijckCasper H JCHJDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands., Sebastiaan Festen, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Nadia Haj Mohammad, de HinghIgnace H J TIHJTDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., Daan J Lips, Maartje Los, Vincent E de Meijer, Gijs A Patijn, Marco B Polée, StommelMartijn W JMWJDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Marieke S Walma, Roeland F de Wilde, Johanna W Wilmink, I Quintus Molenaar, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Marc G Besselink, and Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group.
    • Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
    • Ann. Surg. 2024 May 1; 279 (5): 832841832-841.

    ObjectiveThis nationwide multicenter study aimed to define clinically relevant thresholds of relative serum CA19-9 response after 2 months of induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).BackgroundCA19-9 is seen as leading biomarker for response evaluation in patients with LAPC, but early clinically useful cut-offs are lacking.MethodsAll consecutive patients with LAPC after 4 cycles (m)FOLFIRINOX or 2 cycles gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel induction chemotherapy (±radiotherapy) with CA19-9 ≥5 U/mL at baseline were analyzed (2015-2019). The association of CA19-9 response with median OS (mOS) was evaluated for different CA19-9 cut-off points. Minimum and optimal CA19-9 response were established via log-rank test. Predictors for OS were analyzed using COX regression analysis.ResultsOverall, 212 patients were included, of whom 42 (19.8%) underwent resection. Minimum CA19-9 response demonstrating a clinically significant median OS difference (12.7 vs. 19.6 months) was seen at ≥40% CA19-9 decrease. The optimal cutoff for CA19-9 response was ≥60% decrease (21.7 vs. 14.0 mo, P =0.021). Only for patients with elevated CA19-9 levels at baseline (n=184), CA19-9 decrease ≥60% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59, 95% CI, 0.36-0.98, P =0.042] was independently associated with prolonged OS, as were SBRT (HR=0.42, 95% CI, 0.25-0.70; P =0.001), and resection (HR=0.25, 95% CI, 0.14-0.46, P <0.001), and duration of chemotherapy (HR=0.75, 95% CI, 0.69-0.82, P <0.001).ConclusionsCA19-9 decrease of ≥60% following induction chemotherapy as optimal response cut-off in patients with LAPC is an independent predictor for OS when CA19-9 is increased at baseline. Furthermore, ≥40% is the minimum cut-off demonstrating survival benefit. These cut-offs may be used when discussing treatment strategies during early response evaluation.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.