• Shannon Arnold, Michael Armahizer, Luis F Torres, Hemant Tripathi, Harikrishna Tandri, Jason J Chang, H Alex Choi, and Neeraj Badjatia.
• Program in Trauma, Shock Trauma Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene Street, G7K19, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
• Neurocrit Care. 2023 Dec 1; 39 (3): 639645639-645.

BackgroundShivering is a common adverse effect of achieving and maintaining normothermia in neurocritical care patients. We compared the burden of shivering and shivering-related interventions between a novel transnasal temperature-modulating device (tnTMD) and surface cooling temperature-modulating devices (sTMDs) during the first 24 h of targeted normothermia in mechanically ventilated febrile neurocritical care patients.MethodsThis is a case-control study controlling for factors that impact shiver burden: age, sex, body surface area. All patients underwent transnasal cooling (CoolStat, KeyTech, Inc.) as part of an ongoing multicenter clinical trial (NCT03360656). Patients undergoing treatment with sTMDs were selected from consecutively treated patients during the same time period. Data collected included the following: core body temperature (every 2 h), bedside shivering assessment scale (BSAS) score (every 2 h), and administration of antishivering medication for a BSAS score > 1. Time to normothermia (≤ 37.5 °C), as well as temperature burden > 37.5 °C (°C × h), were compared between groups using Student's t-test for mean differences. The proportion of patients requiring interventions, as well as the number of interventions per patient, was compared using the χ2 test. Significance was determined based on a p value < 0.05.ResultsThere were 10 tnTMD patients and 30 sTMD patients included in the analysis (mean age: 62 ± 4, 30% women, body surface area = 1.97 ± 0.25). There were no differences between groups in temperature at cooling initiation (tnTMD: 38.5 ± 0.2 °C vs. sTMD: 38.7 ± 0.5 °C, p = 0.3), time to ≤ 37.5 °C (tnTMD: 1.8 ± 1.5 h vs. sTMD: 2.9 ± 1.4 h, p = 0.1), or temperature burden > 37.5 (tnTMD: - 0.4 ± 1.13 °C × h vs. sTMD median [IQR]: - 0.57 ± 0.58 °C × h, p = 0.67). The number of tnTMD patients who received pharmacologic shivering interventions was lower than the number of controls (20 vs. 67%, p = 0.01). tnTMD patients also had fewer shivering interventions per patient (0 [range: 0-3] vs. 4 [range: 0-23], p < 0.001).ConclusionsA transnasal cooling approach achieved similar time to normothermia and temperature burden with less shivering than surface cooling. This approach may be a feasible option to consider for mechanically ventilated febrile neurocritical care patients.© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.

17 keywords...

hide…