• Marine Lefèbvre, Kévin Balasoupramanien, Julien Galant, Pierre-Olivier Vidal, Bastien Van Overbeck, Daniel Meyran, Cédric Boutillier du Retail, Aurélien Renard, and Nicolas Cazes.
• Aix-Marseille University, School of medicine, 13005 Marseille, France.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 1; 72: 113121113-121.

BackgroundIn October 2021, French acute care societies jointly published cognitive aids to standardise practices and limit cognitive biases to ensure greater safety in management of severe trauma patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a checklist on emergency physicians' adherence to the recommendations.MethodsThis prospective before-and-after study study took place in a French mobile emergency and resuscitation service. All adults trauma patients referred to hospital were included. A checklist on trauma management inspired by the MARCHE acronym was produced. During phase I, the checklist was performed within 24 h after the end of the intervention. During phase II, the checklist was performed during the patient's transport to hospital, thus allowing potentially omitted procedures to be performed initially. The use of the checklist was systematically evaluated using an anonymous questionnaire among doctors and nurses. In phase II, doctors and nurses who did not perform checklist were systematically asked to answer a specific online questionnaire. The primary outcome was the overall omission rate of checklist items during each phase of the study.ResultsOne hundred and sixteen patients were included, 53 in phase I and 63 in phase II. Eleven patients did not have a checklist in phase II. The overall omission rate of checklist items was significantly lower with checklist (17%) than without (25%) (p = 0.02). This trend increased in proportion to severity with an omission rate of 30% without checklist versus 15% with checklist (p = 0.03) for patients with an ISS ≥ 25. A majority of doctors and nurses who used the checklist considered that it should be made compulsory (82% and 67% respectively). Paradoxically, only 55% of doctors who did not perform the checklist thought it was useful, while the omission rate was significantly higher (17% with checklist compared with 59% without checklist, p < 0.01).ConclusionThis work shows a significant reduction in the number of omissions on the actions carried out during the management of a trauma patient in prehospital settings, allowing better adherence to the recommendations. Its benefit is increased in severely traumatised patients.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…