• Shimiao Feng, Juan Gu, Chao Yu, Jin Liu, and Juan Ni.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 20, Section 3, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, 610000, China.
• BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 28; 23 (1): 255255.

BackgroundProphylactic vasopressor infusion can effectively assist with fluid loading to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. However, the ideal dose varies widely among individuals. We hypothesized that hypotension-susceptible patients requiring cesarean section (C-section) could be identified using combined ultrasound parameters to enable differentiated prophylactic medical interventions.MethodsThis prospective observational trial was carried out within a regional center hospital for women and children in Sichuan Province, China. Singleton pregnant women undergoing combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective C-sections were eligible. Women with contraindications to spinal anesthesia or medical comorbidities were excluded. Velocity time integral (VTI) and left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA) in the supine and left lateral positions were measured on ultrasound before anesthesia. Stroke volume, cardiac output, and the percentage change (%) in each parameter between two positions were calculated. Vital signs and demographic data were recorded. Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was defined as a mean arterial pressure decrease of > 20% from baseline. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to analyze the associations of ultrasound measurements, vital signs, and demographic characteristics with spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. This exploratory study did not have a predefined outcome; however, various parameter combinations were compared using the AUROC to determine which combined parameters had better predictive values.ResultsPatients were divided into the normotension (n = 31) and hypotension groups (n = 57). A combination of heart rate (HR), LVEDAs, and VTI% was significantly better at predicting hypotension than was HR (AUROC 0.827 vs. 0.707, P = 0.020) or LVEDAs (AUROC 0.827 vs. 0.711, P = 0.039) alone, but not significantly better than VTI% alone (AUROC 0.827 vs. 0.766, P = 0.098).ConclusionThe combined parameters of HR and LVEDAs with VTI% may predict spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension more precisely than the single parameters. Future research is necessary to determine whether this knowledge improves maternal and neonatal outcomes.Trial RegistrationChiCTR1900025191.© 2023. The Author(s).

20 keywords...

hide…