• Chest · Jan 2024

    Towards the implementation of optimal cardiac magnetic resonance risk stratification in PAH.

    • Lucas R Celant, Jeroen N Wessels, J Tim Marcus, Lilian J Meijboom, Harm Jan Bogaard, Frances S de Man, and Anton Vonk Noordegraaf.
    • Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Pulmonary Hypertension and Thrombosis, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    • Chest. 2024 Jan 1; 165 (1): 181191181-191.

    BackgroundThe 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines incorporate cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging metrics in the risk stratification of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Thresholds to identify patients at estimated 1-year mortality risks of < 5%, 5% to 20%, and > 20% are introduced. However, these cutoff values are mostly single center-based and require external validation.Research QuestionWhat are the discriminative prognostic properties of the current CMR risk thresholds stratifying patients with PAH?Study Design And MethodsWe analyzed data from incident, treatment-naïve patients with PAH from the Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, The Netherlands. The discriminative properties of the proposed CMR three risk strata were tested at baseline and first reassessment, using the following PH guideline variables: right ventricular ejection fraction, indexed right ventricular end-systolic volume, and indexed left ventricular stroke volume.ResultsA total of 258 patients with PAH diagnosed between 2001 and 2022 fulfilled the study criteria and were included in this study. Of these, 172 had follow-up CMR imaging after 3 months to 1.5 years. According to the CMR three risk strata, most patients were classified at intermediate risk (n = 115 [45%]) upon diagnosis. Only 29 (11%) of patients with PAH were classified at low risk, and 114 (44%) were classified at high risk. Poor survival discrimination was seen between risk groups. Appropriate survival discrimination was seen at first reassessment.InterpretationRisk stratifying patients with PAH with the recent proposed CMR cutoffs from the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society 2022 PH guidelines requires adjustment because post-processing consensus is lacking and general applicability is limited. Risk assessment at follow-up yielded better survival discrimination, emphasizing the importance of the individual treatment response.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.