• Arch Intern Med · Dec 1995

    Meta Analysis

    Complementary medicine. What physicians think of it: a meta-analysis.

    • E Ernst, K L Resch, and A R White.
    • Postgraduate Medical School, University of Exeter, England.
    • Arch Intern Med. 1995 Dec 11; 155 (22): 240524082405-8.

    BackgroundComplementary (or alternative) medicine has become a prevalent phenomenon in most industrialized countries. At present the evidence from randomized controlled trials investigating its effectiveness is fragmentary and therefore inconclusive.ObjectiveTo assess whether physicians perceive complementary medicine as useful and/or effective.MethodA literature search was performed to retrieve all relevant articles. Twelve surveys addressing this question were found and analyzed by evaluating perceived usefulness and/or effectiveness.ResultsThe results show a remarkable variability between surveys. On average physicians perceive complementary medicine as moderately effective--the rating was 46 +/- 18 on a scale of 0 to 100 points. Young physicians seem to judge complementary medicine more optimistically than their more seasoned colleagues. There is no trend to suggest that complementary medicine is increasingly perceived as useful and/or effective. The data do not answer the question whether physicians view complementary medicine as a nonspecific powerful placebo or as specifically effective.ConclusionComplementary medicine may be useful; however, the notion urgently needs to be tested in randomized controlled trials.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…