• Kenneth B Chapman, Tariq Yousef, Ahmad Amireh, Jan Willem Kallewaard, and Noud van Helmond.
• The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York City, USA.
• Pain Pract. 2024 Jan 1; 24 (1): 727572-75.

BackgroundLead anchoring has previously been shown to reduce the rate of dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) lead migration. The aim of this study was to assess longer-term follow-up and consistency of lead migration prevention with lead anchoring in a new cohort of patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review from September 2017 to November 2022 of all patients who had DRG-S implants at our institute to identify the number of lead migrations that occurred over this period. The first cohort consisted of patients reported on in a previous publication (implanted from September 2017 through September 2020) subdivided into unanchored or anchored lead groups. The second cohort consisted of patients implanted during or after October 2020 who were not previously reported on for whom leads were anchored using silastic anchoring only.ResultsAt the November 2022 data cutoff, in the initial cohort, 8 migrations had occurred in unanchored leads over an average follow-up of 49 months, equating to a migration rate of 9.1% per lead. Patients with anchored leads in the initial cohort experienced 2 migrations over an average follow-up of 38 months (0.7% migration rate per lead). There were no new lead migrations in these groups over the extended follow-up reported here. The migration rate in the new cohort was similar, with 1 migration over an average follow-up of 13 months (0.5% migration rate per lead).ConclusionThese results underscore the necessity of anchor placement during DRG-S lead implantation to prevent lead migration.© 2023 World Institute of Pain.

13 keywords...

hide…