• Peter Staats, Timothy R Deer, Corey Hunter, Sean Li, David Dickerson, Erika Petersen, Leonardo Kapural, Shravani Durbhakula, Christopher Gilligan, Konstantin V Slavin, Jason Pope, Kasra Amirdelfan, Lawrence Poree, Ramana Naidu, and Robert M Levy.
• National Spine and Pain Centers, Rockville, MD, USA. Electronic address: pstaats@treatingpain.com.
• Neuromodulation. 2023 Oct 1; 26 (7): 129513081295-1308.

ObjectiveEmerging spinal cord stimulation (SCS) remote monitoring and programming technologies provide a unique opportunity to address challenges of in-person visits and improve patient care, although clinical guidance on implementation is needed. The goal of this document is to establish best clinical practices for integration of remote device management into the care of patients with SCS, including remote monitoring and remote programming.Materials And MethodsA panel of experts in SCS met in July 2022, and additional experts contributed to the development of recommendations after the meeting via survey responses and correspondence.ResultsMajor goals of remote SCS device management were identified, including prompt identification and resolution of SCS-related issues. The panel identified metrics for remote monitoring and classified them into three categories: device-related (eg, stimulation usage); measurable physiologic or disease-related (eg, patient physical activity or pedometry); and patient-reported (eg, sleep quality and pain intensity). Recommendations were made for frequency of reviewing remote monitoring metrics, although providers should tailor follow-up to individual patient needs. Such periodic reviews of remote monitoring metrics would occur separately from automatic monitoring system notifications (if key metrics fall outside an acceptable range). The guidelines were developed in consideration of reimbursement processes, privacy concerns, and the responsibilities of the care team, industry professionals, manufacturers, patients, and caregivers. Both existing and needed clinical evidence were covered, including outcomes of interest for future studies.ConclusionsGiven the expansion of SCS device capabilities, this document provides critical guidance on best practices for using remote device management, although medical necessity should drive all remote monitoring decisions, with individualized patient care. The authors also describe the potential of these emerging technologies to improve outcomes for patients with SCS, although more clinical evidence is needed.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

9 keywords...

hide…