• Spine · Jul 2024

    Comparative Study

    In vivo Comparison of Positive Microbial Culture by Wound Irrigation Methods: Biportal Endoscopic versus Open Microscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

    • Min-Seok Kang, Ki-Han You, Jae-Yeun Hwang, Tack-Geun Cho, Joon-Hyeok Yoon, Chong-Suh Lee, and Hyun-Jin Park.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    • Spine. 2024 Jul 1; 49 (13): 941949941-949.

    Study DesignProspective cohort study.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and prevalence of intraoperative contamination (IoC) through the microbial culture of superficial and deep samples obtained during surgery.Summary Of Background DataSurgical site infection (SSI) in spinal surgery is a serious complication. The prevalence of IoC may differ based on surgical approach and technique, even in the setting of the same procedure.Materials And MethodsIn this in vivo study, microbial cultivation was performed with superficial (ligamentum flavum, LF) and deep (nucleus pulposus, NP) surgical specimens to evaluate IoC in 132 patients undergoing single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Biportal endoscopic -TLIF was performed under continuous wound irrigation (group A, n=66), whereas open microscopic (OM) TLIF was performed under intermittent wound irrigation (group B, n=66). LF and NP specimens were homogenized, gram stained, and cultured in aerobic and anaerobic media for 14 days. Microbial culture results and the occurrence of SSI in the two groups were assessed. The χ 2 test and Fisher exact test were used to determine significant differences among categorical variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of patient characteristics on the prevalence of positive microbial cultures.ResultsOf the 132 patients, 34 (25.8%) had positive microbial cultures, and positive culture required an incubation period of 72 hours to 2 weeks in all these patients except for three. Overall, positive culture was significantly higher in group B than in group A ( P =0.029). The subgroups of LF- and NP-positive cultures were 18.18% (n=24) and 12.88% (n=17), respectively; the SSI was 0.76% (n=1). Group A had a significantly lower subgroup of NP-positive culture than group B ( P =0.035). OM technique was an independent risk factor associated with overall positive culture ( P <0.05). The most common microorganism was Cutibacterium acnes ( C. acnes ).ConclusionsBiportal endoscopic-TLIF with continuous wound irrigation showed significantly lower overall and NP-positive cultures than OM-TLIF with intermittent irrigation. The most common strain of positive culture was C. acnes .Level Of Evidence2.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.