• Kenneth R Conner, Courtney M Jones, Nancy Wood, Aileen Aldalur, Mariam Paracha, Stephen J Powell, Yunbo Nie, Kevin M Dillon, and Jason Rotoli.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
• J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 1; 65 (3): e163e171e163-e171.

BackgroundDeaf individuals who communicate using American Sign Language (ASL) seem to experience a range of disparities in health care, but there are few empirical data.ObjectiveTo examine the provision of common care practices in the emergency department (ED) to this population.MethodsED visits in 2018 at a U.S. academic medical center were assessed retrospectively in Deaf adults who primarily use ASL (n = 257) and hearing individuals who primarily use English, selected at random (n = 429). Logistic regression analyses adjusted for confounders compared the groups on the provision or nonprovision of four routine ED care practices (i.e., laboratories ordered, medications ordered, images ordered, placement of peripheral intravenous line [PIV]) and on ED disposition (admitted to hospital or not admitted).ResultsThe ED encounters with Deaf ASL users were less likely to include laboratory tests being ordered: adjusted odds ratio 0.68 and 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.97. ED encounters with Deaf individuals were also less likely to include PIV placement, less likely to result in images being ordered in the ED care of ASL users of high acuity compared with English users of high acuity (but not low acuity), and less likely to result in hospital admission.ConclusionResults suggest disparate provision of several types of routine ED care for adult Deaf ASL users. Limitations include the observational study design at a single site and reliance on the medical record, underscoring the need for further research and potential reasons for disparate ED care with Deaf individuals.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…