• Dtsch Arztebl Int · Nov 2023

    Computer-Assisted Visual Training in Children and Adolescents With Developmental Visual Disorders—a Systematic Review.

    • Christine Schmucker, Eberhard Thörel, Magdalena Flatscher-Thöni, Dorothea Sow, Anne Göhner, Verena Stühlinger, Nikolai Mühlberger, Wolf A Lagrèze, and Jörg Meerpohl.
    • Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg; Institute for Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Technology; Department of Information Management, Quality and Economic Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne; Center for Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Freiburg University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg; Department of Ophthalmology, Freiburg University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg; Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg.
    • Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Nov 3; 120 (44): 747753747-753.

    BackgroundIn this systematic review, we address the question whether children and adolescents with developmental visual disorders benefit from computer-assisted visual training.MethodsSystematic literature searches were carried out in three bibliographic databases (initial search in October 2021) and trial registries. Included were randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of computer-assisted visual training in children and adolescents with developmental visual disorders in comparison to no training, sham training, or conservative treatment.ResultsThe inclusion criteria were met by 17 trials (with a total of 1323 children and adolescents) focusing on binocular or monocular computer-assisted visual training for the treatment of amblyopia. In these trials, visual training was carried out for 2 to 24 weeks, either as "stand alone" therapy or in addition to occlusion therapy. Six trials showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the visual training for the outcome "best corrected visual acuity of the amblyopic eye." However, this difference was small and mostly below the threshold of clinical relevance of -0.05 logMAR (equivalent to an improvement of 0.5 lines on the eye chart, or 2.5 letters per line). Only few data were available for the outcomes "binocular vision" and "adverse events"; the differences between the groups were similarly small.ConclusionThe currently available data do not permit any firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of visual training in children and adolescents with amblyopia. Moreover, treatment adherence was often insufficient and the treatment durations in the trials was relatively short. No results from randomized trials have yet been published with respect to other developmental visual disorders (refractive errors, strabismus).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.