• Critical care medicine · Jan 2024

    Observational Study

    Prevalence and Risk Factors for Weaning Failure From Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Insufficiency.

    • Felix Gerhardinger, Christoph Fisser, Maximilian V Malfertheiner, Alois Philipp, Maik Foltan, Florian Zeman, Andrea Stadlbauer, Clemens Wiest, Dirk Lunz, Thomas Müller, and Matthias Lubnow.
    • Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
    • Crit. Care Med. 2024 Jan 1; 52 (1): 546754-67.

    ObjectiveAnalysis of the prevalence and risk factors for weaning failure from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in patients with severe acute respiratory insufficiency.DesignSingle-center retrospective observational study.SettingSixteen beds medical ICU at the University Hospital Regensburg.PatientsTwo hundred twenty-seven patients with severe acute respiratory insufficiency requiring VV-ECMO support between October 2011 and December 2017.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsPatients meeting our ECMO weaning criteria (Sp o2 ≥ 90% with F io2 ≤ 0.4 or Pa o2 /F io2 > 150 mm Hg, pH = 7.35-7.45, positive end-expiratory pressure ≤ 10 cm H 2 O, driving pressure < 15 cm H 2 O, respiratory rate < 30/min, tidal volume > 5 mL/kg, ECMO bloodflow ≈ 1. 5 L/min, sweep gas flow ≈ 1 L/min, heart rate < 120/min, systolic blood pressure 90-160 mm Hg, norepinephrine < 0.2 µg/[kg*min]) underwent an ECMO weaning trial (EWT) with pausing sweep gas flow. Arterial blood gas analysis, respiratory and ventilator parameters were recorded prior, during, and after EWTs. Baseline data, including demographics, vitals, respiratory, ventilator, and laboratory parameters were recorded at the time of cannulation. One hundred seventy-nine of 227 (79%) patients were successfully decannulated. Ten patients (4%) underwent prolonged weaning of at least three failed EWTs before successful decannulation. The respiratory rate (19/min vs 16/min, p = 0.002) and Pa co2 (44 mm Hg vs 40 mm Hg, p = 0.003) were higher before failed than successful EWTs. Both parameters were risk factors for ECMO weaning failure (Pa co2 : odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95% CI, 1.001-1.10; p = 0.045; respiratory rate: OR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15; p < 0.001) in multivariable analysis. The rapid shallow breathing index [42 (1/L*min), vs 35 (1/L*min), p = 0.052) was higher before failed than successful EWTs. The decline of Sa o2 and Pa o2 /F io2 during EWTs was higher in failed than successful trials.ConclusionsSeventy-nine percent of patients were successfully decannulated with only 4% needing prolonged ECMO weaning. Before EWT only parameters of impaired ventilation (insufficient decarboxylation, higher respiratory rate) but not of oxygenation were predictive for weaning failure, whereas during EWT-impaired oxygenation was associated with weaning failure.Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.