• Acta neurochirurgica · Oct 2004

    Mild head injury: revisited.

    • S P Thiruppathy and N Muthukumar.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Madurai Medical College, Madurai, India.
    • Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Oct 1;146(10):1075-82; discussion 1082-3.

    Objective1. To define the incidence of positive CT scans in patients with different grades of mild head injury (MHI), 2. To identify clinical predictors of positive CT scans, 3. To evaluate the usefulness of plain radiographs in the triage of patients with MHI, 4. To evaluate frequency and nature of surgical intervention in MHI, 5. To evaluate the risk of deterioration in MHI, and 6. To find out whether patients with normal neurological examination and normal CT can be safely discharged.MethodsIn a prospective study conducted over a period of four months in our center, all patients with mild head injury (defined as Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS) 13-15) were admitted to the head injury unit. Patients underwent standard clinical examination, skull radiography and cranial CT. No clinical criteria were used to select patients for CT scanning and all the patients were subjected to CT. Patients with negative findings on CT and a normal neurological examination were discharged after 24 hours of observation. Patients with positive findings on cranial CT were treated either medically or surgically as deemed necessary. Outcome measures included safe discharge, clinical deterioration, need for surgical intervention or death. The following factors were analyzed statistically to find out whether they can be used as predictive factors for positive cranial CT. They were: age, sex, mode of injury, loss of consciousness, post-traumatic seizures, ear/ nose/throat bleeding, vomiting, admission GCS score, scalp injury, polytrauma, focal neurological deficit, fractures visualized on skull radiography.ResultsThree hundred and eighty one patients were included in the study. Of these males constituted 63%, females 17% and children 20%. RTA was the most common mode of injury. Seventy five percent of the patients had GCS of 15, 15% had GCS of 14 and 10% had GCS of 13. Thirty eight percent of the patients had positive findings on the CT. Age, mode of injury, loss of consciousness, post-traumatic seizures, ENT bleeding, vomiting, scalp injury and polytrauma were not found to be predictors of positive CT. Admission GCS score, focal neurological deficits, and fractures detected by skull radiography were found to be statistically significant predictors of positive findings on CT. Seven percent of patients required surgical intervention. Six percent of patients showed neurological deterioration and there was one death in this series of MHI patients. Patients with multiple lesions on CT had a higher chance of deterioration than those with a single lesion. No patient who had a GCS of 15 and normal CT developed any complication during the hospital stay or after discharge.ConclusionsThe incidence of positive CT scans in this prospective, consecutive, unselected cohort of MHI patients was 38%. Lower admission GCS scores, focal neurological deficits, and fractures detected by skull x-rays were found to be significant predictors of positive CT. Other clinical parameters were not found to be predictors of positive CT. CT was found to be superior to plain x-rays in detecting skull fractures. Seven percent of this cohort required neurosurgical intervention. Six percent showed neurological deterioration and there was one death in this series. Patients with multiple lesions on CT had a higher chance of deterioration than those with single lesions. The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in patients with positive CT. As no patient with a normal neurological examination and a normal CT deteriorated, we believe these patients can be safely discharged without need for admission and observation.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.