-
Journal of neurosurgery · Mar 2024
Management and outcome predictors of patients with ruptured deep-seated brain arteriovenous malformations.
- Shahab Aldin Sattari, Wuyang Yang, James Feghali, Alice Hung, Risheng Xu, Rafael J Tamargo, and Judy Huang.
- J. Neurosurg. 2024 Mar 1; 140 (3): 755763755-763.
ObjectiveDecision-making for the management of ruptured deep-seated brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) is controversial. This study aimed to shed light on the treatment outcomes of patients with ruptured deep-seated bAVMs.MethodsData on bAVM patients were retrieved from the authors' institutional database, spanning 1990-2021. The outcomes were annual hemorrhage risk (before and after intervention), number of follow-up hemorrhages, bAVM obliteration, poor modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (i.e., mRS score > 2), worsened mRS score, and mortality. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine predictors of time-to-event and categorical outcomes, respectively.ResultsOf the 1066 patients in the database with brain bAVM, 177 patients harboring ruptured deep-seated bAVMs were included. The pretreatment annual hemorrhage risk was 8.24%, and the posttreatment risk was lowered to 1.65%. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, a prenidal aneurysm (HR 2.388, 95% CI 1.057-5.398; p = 0.036) was associated with a higher risk of follow-up hemorrhage, while definitive treatment (i.e., either surgery or radiosurgery vs endovascular embolization or conservative management) (HR 0.267, 95% CI 0.118-0.602; p = 0.001) was associated with a lower risk of follow-up hemorrhage. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, Spetzler-Martin grades IV and V (OR 0.404, 95% CI 0.171-0.917; p = 0.033) and brainstem arteriovenous malformation (AVM) (OR 0.325, 95% CI 0.128-0.778; p = 0.014) were associated with lower odds of obliteration, while definitive treatment (OR 8.864, 95% CI 3.604-25.399; p = 0.008) was associated with higher obliteration odds. Controlling for baseline mRS score, cerebellar AVM (OR 0.286, 95% CI 0.098-0.731; p = 0.013) and definitive treatment (OR 0.361, 95% CI 0.160-0.807; p = 0.013) were associated with lower odds of a poor mRS score, and definitive treatment (OR 0.208, 95% CI 0.076-0.553; p = 0.001) was associated with lower odds of a worsened mRS score. Furthermore, smoking (OR 6.068, 95% CI 1.531-25.581; p = 0.01) and definitive treatment (OR 0.101, 95% CI 0.024-0.361; p = 0.007) were associated with higher and lower mortality odds, respectively.ConclusionsA definitive treatment strategy seems to be beneficial in achieving higher obliteration and lower hemorrhage rates while decreasing the odds of a poor mRS score, worsened mRS score, and mortality. In this category of patients, prenidal aneurysms warrant treatment, and smoking cessation should be encouraged.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.