• Medicine · Sep 2023

    Clinical Trial

    Treatment of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit in the general population with shoulder pain: An open single-arm clinical trial.

    • Rafael Jácome-López, Javier Tejada-Gallego, José María Silberberg, Fernando García-Sanz, and Francisco García-Muro San José.
    • Physiotherapy Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 22; 102 (38): e35263e35263.

    BackgroundMaladaptation can provoke important alterations in the arthrokinematics such as an internal rotation reduction in the dominant shoulder compared with the nondominant shoulder known as glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). Though the number of studies investigating GIRD in athletic population, there are not studies reporting the efficacy of the GIRD treatment in the nonathlete population, a kind of study required to improve our understanding of patient care with this pathology. This study aimed to describe the efficacy of the GIRD treatment in nonathlete population with shoulder pain.MethodsAn open single-arm trial with 35 patients was adopted for evaluating the efficacy of GIRD treatment in patients with shoulder pain. All patients with shoulder pain who attended the consultation, accepted, and agreed to participate in the study between October 2020 and March 2021 were included. A treatment sequence including joint manual therapy techniques and soft tissue release techniques was applied in the consultation. Then, patients were instructed to adapt the daily active biological stimulus at home. The IR before (IR0) and after (IR1) the treatment was considered the outcome measure. The GIRD was calculated as the difference between the IR of the non-painful shoulder and the IR of the painful shoulder before (GIRD0) and after treatment (GIRD1). A paired Student t test was used to compare the GIRD of each patient before and after the treatment.ResultsTreatment of the patients significantly increased the IR of the painful shoulder in all the patients (P-value < .0001) So, the mean IR0 was 26.09 ± 14.46º (23.64-28.53), and after the treatment the mean IR1 was 67.98 ± 15.03º (65.48-70.52). The mean difference after the treatment (IR1-IR0) was 41.89 ± 14.74º (39.4-44.39). The treatment also significantly reduced GIRD (P-value < .0001). So, the mean GIRD0 was 42.95 ± 16.26º (40.2-45.7), and after the treatment the mean GIRD1 was -1.05 ± 17.18º (-3.96 to 1.85).ConclusionsThe treatment administrated in this study significantly increased the internal rotation of the treated and painful shoulder and reduced the GIRD from the first consultation.Level Of EvidenceLevel 3.Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…