-
- Zhangtian Xia, Ying Ma, Zhiqiang Zhang, Ruxiang Wang, and Ming Yao.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, People's Republic of China; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, People's Republic of China.
- Pain Physician. 2023 Sep 1; 26 (5): E591E600E591-E600.
BackgroundBoth computed tomography-guided extracranial nongasserian ganglion radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) and percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) have significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, but a comparison of the efficacy of the 2 methods for pain in primary multibranch trigeminal neuralgia (TN) has not been studied clinically.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of PBC with extracranial nongasserian ganglion RFT in the treatment of primary multibranch TN.Study DesignThis is a single-center, retrospective, observational study.SettingThis study was conducted at the Pain Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing College in Jiaxing, People's Republic of China.MethodsA total of 202 patients, including 112 patients in the RFT group and 90 patients in the PBC group, with multi-branch TN who visited the pain department of Jiaxing First Hospital for percutaneous minimally invasive surgery from April 2016 through June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in both groups were followed-up regularly after surgery, and the Numeric Rating Scale, recurrence-free survival rate, Barrow Neurological Institute facial numbness score, and other postoperative complications were recorded before surgery (T0), immediately after surgery (T1) and at 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), 12 months (T4), and 15 months (T5) postoperatively.ResultsAll patients completed the operation successfully. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of gender, age, pain duration, preoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11), lateralization of pain and affected branches, and preoperative underlying disease (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in preoperative and immediate postoperative NRS-11 scores between the 2 groups (P < 0.01). NRS-11 scores decreased at each time point (T1-T5) and were significantly different from preoperative scores (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, no significant difference was found in NRS-11 scores at T0, T1, and T2 between the RFT and PBC groups (P > 0.05). However, the differences were statistically significant at T3 (P < 0.05), T4 (P < 0.001), and T5 (P < 0.001). BNI-N scores decreased in both groups at T2, T3, T4, and T5 after surgery and were significantly different from preoperative scores (P < 0.05). BNI-N scores were significantly lower in the PBC group than in the RFT group at all time points (P < 0.05). In the long-term treatment of multibranch trigeminal neuralgia, the PBC group exhibited a lower recurrence rate than the RFT group. No severe complications or deaths were observed in either of the 2 groups.LimitationsA small sample size and being conducted at a single center are limitations of our study.ConclusionBoth RFT and PBC were effective in relieving primary multibranch TN, but patients in the PBC group had a lower recurrence-free survival rate, fewer complications, and a better safety profile. Follow-up studies with a larger patient sample held at multiple locations should be conducted.Key WordsRadiofrequency thermocoagulation, percutaneous balloon compression, trigeminal neuralgia, extracranial nongasserian ganglion, multibranch pain.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.