• Julien Rousset, Jean Derely, Morgan LE Guen, Mickaël Soued, Marc Fischler, Frédéric J Mercier, Alexandre Vallee, and Agnes LE Gouez.
• Service of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France - j.rousset@hopital-foch.com.
• Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Dec 1; 89 (12): 106510731065-1073.

BackgroundThe estimation of gastric content in third trimester pregnant women has already been studied, conclusions remain contradictory. The aim of this study was to compare gastric content in pregnant and non-pregnant women using gastric ultrasound. We performed an observational two-center study of women scheduled for a cesarean section (CS group) and of non-pregnant women scheduled for hysteroscopy (HS group).MethodsUltrasound evaluation was performed before surgery with measurement of antral cross-sectional area (CSA) in the semi-recumbent position (SRP), primary outcome, and in the right lateral position (RLD). Gastric fluid volume (GFV) was calculated. Results are expressed as medians (25th and 75th percentiles). Perlas Score was evaluated and expressed as number (percentage).ResultsSixty patients in the CS group and 64 in the HS group were analyzed. Antral CSA (SRP) was greater in the CS group (350 mm2 [236-415] vs. 247 mm2 [180-318]; P=0.001). Antral CSA (RLD) was also significantly greater in the CS group (P=0.027). GFV was not different between groups whether expressed in absolute value (P=0.516) or relative to weight (P=0.946) mL.kg-1. Perlas Score repartition was similar in both groups (P=0.860). Kappa coefficients of concordance between CSA, GFV and Perlas Score were slight or at best fair.ConclusionsOur study confirmed that antral CSA is increased among pregnant women and outlined that antral CSA should not be used alone in the decision-making process especially when the results of indicators (antral CSA, GFV, and Perlas Grading Score) are discordant.

14 keywords...

hide…