• Davide Enrici Baion, Alberto La Ferrara, Davide Maserin, Stefania Caprioli, Rosina Albano, Francesco Malara, Francesca Locascio, Emanuela Galluzzo, Deborah Luison, Matteo Lombardo, Roberta Navarra, Gilberto Calzolari, Maria Tizzani, Isabella Prisciandaro, Fulvio Morello, Pietro Tuttolomondo, Alberto Goffi, Enrico Lupia, and Emanuele Pivetta.
• Emergency Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Molinette Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec 1; 74: 495649-56.

BackgroundThe insertion of peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheters is one of the most performed invasive procedures in acute healthcare settings. However, peripheral difficult vascular access (PDVA) is not uncommon and can lead to delays in administering essential medications. Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a valuable tool for facilitating PIV cannulation. Advancements in technology have introduced a technique known as bi-plane imaging, allowing the simultaneous display of both longitudinal and transverse views of vessels. We aimed to investigate whether the utilization of bi-plane imaging, as opposed to the single-plane approach, would yield superior results for PDVA in the emergency department (ED).MethodsThis study was a single-center randomized controlled trial. We included adult patients admitted to the ED who required PIV cannulation. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo cannulation using either the mono-plane or bi-plane approach, both performed by skilled providers. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the first attempt success rates between the two techniques.ResultsA total of 442 patients were enrolled, with 221 undergoing cannulation attempts using the mono-plane approach. Successful placement of a functioning PIV catheter was achieved in a single attempt for 313 out of 442 patients (70.8%). There was no significant difference in the success rates between the two study groups: 68.3% in the mono-plane group and 73.3% in the bi-plane group (p = 0.395). The median time required for a successful attempt differed between the groups, with 45 s (range 18-600) in the mono-plane group and 35 s (range 20-600) in the bi-plane group (p = 0.03).ConclusionsOur study confirms that US is a highly effective tool for facilitating PIV cannulation in patients with PDVA presenting to the ED. However, our investigation into the use of bi-plane imaging did not reveal a significant improvement when compared to mono-plane imaging.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…