• Am J Emerg Med · Dec 2023

    Hospitalization and evaluation of brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs) from a statewide sample.

    • Lindsay H Boles, Kathleen A Noorbakhsh, Tracie Smith, and Sriram Ramgopal.
    • Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America. Electronic address: lboles@mcw.edu.
    • Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec 1; 74: 909490-94.

    ObjectiveThe 2016 clinical practice guideline (CPG) replacing apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) with brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) was associated with a reduction in hospitalizations and clinical testing among children with this condition in pediatric hospitals. However, as only a minority of acute-care encounters occur in dedicated pediatric centers, the overall effect of this CPG on children with ALTE/BRUE remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine changes in the diagnosis and management of BRUE in a statewide sample of non-pediatric hospitals following publication of the CPG.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of encounters of infants (<1 year) presenting to 178 non-pediatric Illinois Emergency Departments (EDs) between 2013 and 2019 with an International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9th and 10th revision billing code of ALTE or BRUE (799.82, ICD-9; R68.13, ICD-10). Our primary outcomes were counts of ALTE/BRUE and the percent of patients with ALTE/BRUE admitted and/or transferred to another facility. Our secondary outcome was clinical testing. We used interrupted time-series analysis for our primary outcome and chi-square testing for secondary outcomes. Results were stratified into academic and community EDs.ResultsThis study included 4639 ED encounters for infants with BRUE that presented to academic EDs (2229; 48.0%) or community EDs (2410; 52.0%). At academic EDs, ALTE/BRUE diagnoses were increasing by 2.3 per quarter prior to the CPG publication and decreased by 0.5 per quarter after the CPG publication, representing a change in slope of -2.8 per quarter (p < 0.01). The percent of ALTE/BRUE patients admitted/transferred was decreasing by 0.1% per quarter in the pre-intervention period and decreased by 0.3% per quarter in the post-intervention period, representing a change in slope of 0.7% (p = 0.03). At community EDs, ALTE/BRUE diagnoses were increasing by 2.9 per quarter prior to the CPG publication and increased by 1.4 per quarter after the CPG publication, a non-significant change in slope. The percent of ALTE/BRUE patients admitted/transferred was decreasing by 1.6% in the pre-intervention period and decreased by 0.9% in the post-intervention period, a non-significant change in slope. At academic EDs, there was no significant change in clinical testing. At community EDs, a lower proportion of patients in the post-intervention period had chest radiographs, blood cultures, metabolic panels, blood counts, and urine testing, while a higher proportion had pertussis testing and respiratory pathogen testing.ConclusionsCounts of BRUE diagnoses and the overall proportion of children admitted or transferred showed a consistent decrease at academic EDs but had a nonsignificant change in trend at community EDs following the CPG publication in 2016. There was no significant change in clinical testing at academic EDs while community EDs had a significant decrease in some testing and an increase in other types of testing. Our findings suggest the need for greater implementation efforts in non-pediatric settings, specifically community EDs, where pediatric patients with BRUE present infrequently in order to optimize care for these children.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…