• Gijs Hesselink, Rutger Verhage, van der HorstIwan C CICCMaastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Cardiovascular research institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands., Hans van der Hoeven, and Marieke Zegers.
• Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Intensive Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: gijs.hesselink@radboudumc.nl.
• J Crit Care. 2024 Feb 1; 79: 154440154440.

PurposeTo select a consensus-based set of relevant and feasible indicators for monitoring and improving the quality of regional ICU network collaboratives.MethodsA three-round Delphi study was conducted in the Netherlands between April and July 2022. A multidisciplinary expert panel prioritized potentially relevant and feasible indicators in two questionnaire rounds with two consensus meetings between both rounds. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used to categorize indicators and synthesize results. A core set of highest ranked indicators with consensus-based levels of relevance and feasibility were finally tested in two ICU networks to assess their measurability.ResultsTwenty-four indicators were deemed as relevant and feasible. Seven indicators were selected for the core set measuring the standardized mortality rate in the region (n = 1) and evaluating the presence, content and/or follow-up of a formal plan describing network structures and policy agreements (n = 3), a long-term network vision statement (n = 1), and network meetings to reflect on and learn from outcome data (n = 2). The practice tests led to minor reformulations.ConclusionsThis study generated relevant and feasible indicators for monitoring and improving the quality of ICU network collaboratives based on the collective opinion of various experts. The indicators may help to effectively govern such networks.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

10 keywords...

hide…