• Acad Emerg Med · Aug 2002

    Comparative Study

    Assessment of stroke index using impedance cardiography: comparison with traditional vital signs for detection of moderate acute blood loss in healthy volunteers.

    • Joshua M Kosowsky, Jin H Han, Sean P Collins, Andrew T McAfee, and Alan B Storrow.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. jmkosowsky@partners.org
    • Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Aug 1;9(8):775-80.

    ObjectivesImpedance cardiography has been used to detect early hemorrhagic shock, but, to the best of the authors' knowledge, no previous study has looked at the test characteristics of bioimpedance-derived hemodynamic parameters for the detection of a measured loss of blood volume. The authors set out to investigate the effect of controlled hemorrhage on stroke index (SI) using impedance cardiography, and to evaluate the performance of this test for moderate blood loss in comparison with the performance of traditional vital signs.MethodsSupine and standing measurements of SI were made using a thoracic electrical bioimpedance monitor in 197 healthy, adult volunteers before and after donation of a standard unit (500 mL) of whole blood. Pre- and post-donation means for supine SI, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and for the postural changes in each of these measurements ( triangle up SI, triangle up HR, triangle up SBP, triangle up DBP), were compared using a paired-sample, two-tailed t-test. For each term, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, treating pre- and post-donation populations as independent. Areas under the ROC curves were compared using a method for correlated test result data.ResultsMean +/- SD pre- and post-donation values for SI were 47.0 +/- 6.9 mL/m(2) and 43.9 +/- 7.3 mL/m(2), respectively (p < 0.0001). Mean pre- and post-donation values for triangle up SI were -7.7 +/- 5.8 mL/m(2) and -9.0 +/- 8.2 mL/m(2), respectively (p = 0.02). For discriminating between pre- and post-donation status, the areas under the ROC curves for SI and triangle up SI were 0.62 and 0.58, respectively. In comparison, the areas under the ROC curves for HR, SBP, DBP, triangle up HR, triangle up SBP, and triangle up DBP were 0.49, 0.61, 0.56, 0.82, 0.53, and 0.50, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for triangle up HR was significantly greater than the area under any of the other curves (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsModerate blood loss was associated with a decline in mean SI that was clearly detectable with impedance cardiography. However, as a test for moderate blood loss in this controlled setting, neither SI nor triangle up SI performed better than traditional vital signs.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.