• Amr Mahmoud Abdelmotaal, Ahmed Mohamed Abdelsalam, Sameh Adel Desawy Bakry, Rania Hassan Abdel Hafiez, and Amr Reda Mabrouk.
• Plastic, burn, and maxillofacial surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Egypt. Electronic address: amr-mahmoud@med.asu.edu.eg.
• Burns. 2024 Feb 1; 50 (1): 197203197-203.

IntroductionMassive burn patients are at risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) as a complication of resuscitation.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus 5% albumin solution on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in massive burn patients.MethodsThis was a prospective randomized clinical trial carried on at Ain Shams University (ASU) burn unit for 2 years. Where adult patients with burns more than 20% of TBSA were equally randomized into HES group or albumin group.ResultsFifty-two patients were equally randomized into 2 groups. We found no difference in age, sex, weight, type of burn, and TBSA between the two groups. The mean total resuscitation fluid volume in the first 48 h was 213 ml/kg and 206.2 ml/kg for the HES group and the albumin group respectively (p = 0.674). IAP statistically was non-significantly higher in the HES group. We found no statistical difference between the two groups as regards the renal function tests.ConclusionBoth HES and 5% albumin solution are effective and safe colloids for burn resuscitation. As regards the IAP, it seems that both 5% albumin and HES have comparable effect regarding IAH in severely burn patients. Both HES and 5% albumin were partially equal in terms of renal involvement and vital data stability.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…