• Acad Emerg Med · Apr 2024

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Efficacy and Safety Of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared To Sham Procedure in Adult Patients With Rib Fractures Presenting To The Emergency Department: A Randomized Control Trial.

    • Swetha Ramesh, S Manu Ayyan, Durga Prasad Rath, and SadanandanDeepthy MelepurakkalDM0000-0001-8547-2901Research Scientist and Biostatistician, Women's & Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College of KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Puducherry, India..
    • Department of Emergency Medicine & Trauma, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
    • Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 1; 31 (4): 316325316-325.

    ObjectivesThe primary objective was to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with a sham procedure in adult patients presenting with rib fractures to the emergency department (ED).MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted at an academic ED over a 17-month period. Forty-six adults with confirmed rib fractures and numeric rating score (NRS) greater than 4 were randomized to one of two treatment arms: ultrasound-guided ESPB group or placebo (sham procedure). Intravenous opioids were prescribed as rescue analgesia when self-reported pain scores were ≥4. The primary outcome measure, pain intensity reduction, was derived using the 11-point NRS at six time points over 12 h. Secondary outcome measures included the amount of rescue analgesia, in morphine equivalents, and the occurrence of adverse events. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare the trend in NRSs across the two arms. The association between the complications and intervention was explored using the Fisher's exact test.ResultsForty-six patients (23 in each arm) completed the study. There was no difference between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, vital signs, preenrollment analgesia, or baseline pain intensity. In comparing pain intensity during the study period, NRS scores at 30, 60, and 120 min were significantly lower in the ESPB group (p < 0.001) during rest and deep inspiration. Moreover, patients in the ESPB group received lesser rescue analgesia than those in the sham group (10 mg, IQR 2.5 vs. 20 mg, IQR 5 mg; p ≤ 0.01). There was no difference in adverse events between groups.ConclusionsUltrasound-guided ESPB resulted in significantly reduced pain intensity over the study period and reduced amount of rescue analgesia and had no discernible difference in adverse events when compared with a sham.© 2023 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.