-
Annals of Saudi medicine · Sep 2019
Comparative StudyCord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism.
- Fahad Al Juraibah, Ali Alothaim, Al EyaidWafaWFrom the Department of Pediatrics, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia., and Angham Nasser AlMutair.
- From the Department of Pediatrics, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Ann Saudi Med. 2019 Sep 1; 39 (5): 291294291-294.
BackgroundScreening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) using cord blood or heel-stick samples is considered essential for the prevention of long-term complications CH, which include intellectual disability and slow growth.ObjectiveCompare the sensitivity and specificity of cord blood and heel-stick samples for determining thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels for the detection of CH.DesignComparative diagnostic accuracy.SettingsTertiary care center in Riyadh.Patients And MethodsThe study included all infants who were delivered during the period from May 2011 to May 2013. As part of routine newborn screening, both cord blood and heel-stick samples were collected from each newborn for CH screening by measuring TSH levels. A cord TSH level was considered positive if the concentration of TSH was more than 60 mIU/L and negative if less than 30 mIU/L. Any cord TSH level between 30-60 mIU/L was considered borderline, and free T4 was measured from the same cord sample. The result was considered positive if the free T4 level was below 9 pmol/L. Heel-stick TSH levels more than 20 µU/L were considered positive. All newborns with positive results were recalled and a peripheral venous sample was taken for TSH and free T4 for confirmation.Main Outcome MeasuresSensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values and recall rates.Sample Size17 729 screened babies.ResultsOf 17 729 neonates screened, 7 were diagnosed as having primary CH. All confirmed cases were detected by both cord and heel-stick TSH levels: 88 cord results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.6%, with a recall rate of 0.04%) and 305 heel-stick results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.3%, with a recall rate of 1.68%).ConclusionBoth cord and heel-stick TSH testing detected all cases of CH. Cord testing was superior to heel-stick testing as the recall rate was lower. We think cord TSH testing is preferable when heel-stick is difficult or early discharge is the practice.LimitationsRetrospective; the timing of newborn screening for TSH sampling was premature.Conflict Of InterestNone.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.