• Michael Eichlseder, Michael Eichinger, Alexander Pichler, Daniel Freidorfer, Martin Rief, Philipp Zoidl, and Paul Zajic.
• Division of General Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Styria, Austria.
• Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 1; 82 (5): 558563558-563.

Study ObjectiveEnd-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) is used to guide ventilation after achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in certain out-of-hospital systems, despite an unknown difference between arterial and end-tidal CO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide [paCO2]-etCO2 difference) levels in this population. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify the paCO2-etCO2 difference in out-of-hospital patients with ROSC after nontraumatic cardiac arrest.MethodsThis retrospective single-center study included patients aged 18 years and older with sustained ROSC after nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In patients with an existing out-of-hospital arterial blood gas analysis within 30 minutes after achieving ROSC, matching etCO2 values were evaluated. Linear regression and Bland-Altman plot analysis were performed to ascertain the primary endpoint of interest.ResultsWe included data of 60 patients in the final analysis. The mean paCO2-etCO2 difference was 32 (±18) mmHg. Only a moderate correlation (R2=0.453) between paCO2 and etCO2 was found. Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of 32 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], 27 to 36) [the upper limit of agreement of 67 mmHg (95% CI, 59 to 74) and the lower limit of agreement of -3 mmHg (95% CI, -11 to 5)].ConclusionThe paCO2-etCO2 difference in patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is far from physiologic ranges, and the between-patient variability is high. Therefore, etCO2-guided adaption of ventilation might not provide adequate accuracy in this setting.Copyright © 2023 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…