• Ritu Basnet, Mark P Jensen, Anupa Pathak, Gagan Gurung, Narendra Singh Thagunna, Elisa MaharjanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Star Hospital, Lalitpur, Bagmati, Nepal., Harrison Hansford, Riju MaharjanDepartment of Physiotherapy, Upendra Devkota Memorial Hospital, Bansbari, Kathmandu, Nepal., Michael Nicholas, and Saurab Sharma.
• Department of Psychology, K and K International College, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal; Department of Physiotherapy, Scheer Memorial Hospital, Banepa, Bagmati, Nepal; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, T.U. Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
• J Pain. 2024 Apr 1; 25 (4): 918933918-933.

AbstractThe Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is commonly used in pain self-efficacy research. Yet its Nepali translation is unavailable, limiting the ability to conduct cross-cultural research on the role of self-efficacy in musculoskeletal pain and its management. This study aimed to 1) translate and culturally adapt the 10-item (PSEQ-10) and 2-item (PSEQ-2) versions of the PSEQ into Nepali, 2) evaluate their measurement properties in Nepali adults with musculoskeletal pain, and 3) evaluate whether the type of administration (ie, hard-copy vs online) affected their measurement properties. The measurement properties of different administrations of the Nepali PSEQ-10 and PSEQ-2 were evaluated in 180 Nepali adults (120 hard-copy and 60 online administrations) with musculoskeletal pain. We conducted confirmatory factor analyses and estimated the measures' internal consistencies, test-retest reliabilities, and smallest detectable changes using standard error of measurement. We planned to conclude that the measures were valid if ≥ 75% of the validity hypotheses were supported. The results supported unidimensionality for the Nepali PSEQ-10. The Nepali PSEQ-2 and PSEQ-10 evidenced excellent internal consistencies (Cronbach alphas = .90-.95) and good to excellent test-retest reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficient = .61-.85) for both administrations. Construct validity (r's ≥ .20) and concurrent validity (r's ≥ .83) were supported, as hypothesized. Both hard-copy and online administrations of the Nepali PSEQ-2 and PSEQ-10 are similar, reliable, and valid ways to assess self-efficacy in Nepali adults with musculoskeletal pain. The findings should facilitate telehealth and cross-cultural research on pain self-efficacy in Nepal. PERSPECTIVE: This is the first Nepali adaptation of a self-efficacy scale with testing of measurement properties for hard-copy and online administrations. It will facilitate the assessment of pain self-efficacy in clinical practice and research and facilitate a deeper cross-cultural understanding of the role of self-efficacy in musculoskeletal pain.Copyright © 2024 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…