-
Journal of neurosurgery · Feb 2024
Troubleshooting the bypass: intraoperative management of initially failed anastomosis in direct cerebral revascularization surgery.
- Omer Doron, Devon B O'Donnell, Colin Dallimore, Hamza Khilji, Jacob D Greisman, Michelle Villagran, Rafael A Ortiz, Erez Nossek, Jason A Ellis, and David J Langer.
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, New York, New York.
- J. Neurosurg. 2024 Feb 1; 140 (2): 450462450-462.
ObjectiveDirect cerebral revascularization is considered as one of the most technically challenging operations in neurosurgery. Technical errors are often not identified during the case, but only after the recirculation stage, making management crucial at that time of the procedure. In this study, the authors sought to describe troubleshooting of the technical errors encountered in initially failed bypass cases.MethodsA retrospective analysis describing a single-surgeon, single-institution experience between 2014 and 2021 was performed, based on operative reports and videos, including a 30-day follow-up period. Initially failed bypass was defined if the bypass was not patent or had a significant leak after recirculation, irrespective of the final result.ResultsOne hundred thirty-eight bypass cases were reviewed for complex aneurysms (n = 49), moyamoya disease (n = 59), and atherosclerosis (n = 30). Fifty-one initially failed anastomoses were identified; 43 of these were the result of a technical error. Etiologies of these failed anastomoses included a clot (n = 14), vessel kinking (n = 4), spasm (n = 5), suture-related cause (n = 5), inappropriate donor or recipient (n = 3), or lack of demand (n = 8). A major leak was attributed to an uncoagulated side branch (n = 4), vessel injury due to suture/clip placement (n = 1), or inadequate suture line coverage (n = 7). Thirty-seven (86%) of 43 cases were troubleshot successfully, as salvage maneuvers included papaverine vessel massage, donor repositioning, re-anastomosis for occlusion in select cases, local hemostatic agents, and suturing or coagulating side branches in a leak. Thirty-day follow-up revealed similar rates of patency between successfully troubleshot patients (35/37) and the rest of the cases (80/87, p = 0.6).ConclusionsThree major patterns of a noncompatible bypass were found: a major leak, an acute occlusion, or a delayed occlusion. Based on the authors' experience, salvage strategies proved successful, showing an eventual high patency rate. The authors suggest a gradual, structured algorithm to address this stage in surgery that may contribute specifically to cerebrovascular neurosurgeons at the beginning of their careers.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.