-
- Gitte Bruun Lauridsen, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Peter Thye-Rønn, Sanne Rasmussen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, and Jesper Lykkegaard.
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.
- Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec 1; 73 (737): e941e948e941-e948.
BackgroundMost cancer diagnostic pathways start from primary care and several factors affect the diagnostic processes.AimTo analyse the associations between patient characteristics, symptom presentation, and cancer type and the GP's assessment of the diagnostic processes.Design And SettingGeneral practices in the North, Central, and Southern regions of Denmark were invited to participate in a questionnaire survey.MethodParticipating GPs received a list of patients with incident cases of cancer in the period between 1 March 2019 and 28 February 2021 based on administrative hospital data. A questionnaire was completed for each patient, addressing symptom presentation and the GP's assessment of the diagnostic process both overall and in four subcategories (the patient's role, the GP's role, the transition between primary and secondary care, and the secondary sector's role).ResultsA total of 187 general practices informed on 8240 patients. For 5868 patients, diagnostic pathways started in general practice. Almost half (48.3%, 2837/5868) presented with specific cancer symptoms. GPs assessed 55.6% (3263) and 32.3% (1897) of the diagnostic processes as 'very good' and 'predominantly good', respectively; 11.9% (700) were 'predominantly poor' or 'very poor' for these 5868 patients. Long symptom duration of ≥2 months prior to GP contact and presenting with non-specific or a combination of non-specific and specific symptoms were associated with a poor overall assessment of the diagnostic process. Assessment in the four subcategories showed that the patient's role was assessed less positively than the other three categories.ConclusionA longer symptom duration and presenting without cancer-specific symptoms were associated with GPs assessing the diagnostic process as poor.© The Authors.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.