• Vittorio Perduca, Olivier Bouaziz, Kostantinos Zannis, Marc Beaussier, and Olivier Untereiner.
• Université Paris Cité, CNRS, MAP5, Paris, France.
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2024 Oct 1; 168 (4): 11201129.e91120-1129.e9.

ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to improve decision making regarding the transfusion of patients at the end of extracorporeal circulation for cardiac surgery through machine learning predictions of the evolution of platelets counts, prothrombin ratio, and fibrinogen assay.MethodsProspective data with information about patient preoperative biology and surgery characteristics were collected at Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Hospital (Paris, France) for 10 months (n = 598). For each outcome of interest, instead of arbitrarily choosing 1 machine learning algorithm, we trained and tested a variety of algorithms together with the super learning algorithm, a state-of-the-art ensemble method that aggregates all the predictions and selects the best performing algorithm (total, 137 algorithms). We considered the top-performing algorithms and compared them to more standard and interpretable multivariable linear regression models. All algorithms were evaluated through their root mean squared error, a measure of the average difference between true and predicted values.ResultsThe root mean squared error of the top algorithms for predicting the difference between pre- and postoperative platelet counts, prothrombin ratio, and fibrinogen assay were 38.27 × 10e9/L, 8.66%, and 0.44 g/L, respectively. The linear models had similar performances.ConclusionsOur machine learning algorithms accurately predicted prothrombin ratio and fibrinogen assay and less accurately platelet counts. As such, our models could provide an aid-decision tool for anesthetists in an operating room; future clinical trials addressing this hypothesis are warranted.Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…