-
Pediatr Crit Care Me · Mar 2024
A Prognostic Model for Critically Ill Children in Locations With Emerging Critical Care Capacity.
- Arjun Chandna, Suy Keang, Meas Vorlark, Bran Sambou, Chhay Chhingsrean, Heav Sina, Pav Vichet, Kaajal Patel, Eang Habsreng, Arthur Riedel, Lazaro Mwandigha, Constantinos Koshiaris, Rafael Perera-Salazar, Paul Turner, Ngoun Chanpheaktra, and Claudia Turner.
- Cambodia Oxford Medical Research Unit, Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia.
- Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2024 Mar 1; 25 (3): 189200189-200.
ObjectivesTo develop a clinical prediction model to risk stratify children admitted to PICUs in locations with limited resources, and compare performance of the model to nine existing pediatric severity scores.DesignRetrospective, single-center, cohort study.SettingPICU of a pediatric hospital in Siem Reap, northern Cambodia.PatientsChildren between 28 days and 16 years old admitted nonelectively to the PICU.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsClinical and laboratory data recorded at the time of PICU admission were collected. The primary outcome was death during PICU admission. One thousand five hundred fifty consecutive nonelective PICU admissions were included, of which 97 died (6.3%). Most existing severity scores achieved comparable discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves [AUCs], 0.71-0.76) but only three scores demonstrated moderate diagnostic utility for triaging admissions into high- and low-risk groups (positive likelihood ratios [PLRs], 2.65-2.97 and negative likelihood ratios [NLRs], 0.40-0.46). The newly derived model outperformed all existing severity scores (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88; p < 0.001). Using one particular threshold, the model classified 13.0% of admissions as high risk, among which probability of mortality was almost ten-fold greater than admissions triaged as low-risk (PLR, 5.75; 95% CI, 4.57-7.23 and NLR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37-0.59). Decision curve analyses indicated that the model would be superior to all existing severity scores and could provide utility across the range of clinically plausible decision thresholds.ConclusionsExisting pediatric severity scores have limited potential as risk stratification tools in resource-constrained PICUs. If validated, our prediction model would be a readily implementable mechanism to support triage of critically ill children at admission to PICU and could provide value across a variety of contexts where resource prioritization is important.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.