• Patient Prefer Adher · Jan 2016

    Development and validation of a predictive model of failed stepping-down of inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthmatics.

    • Akira Yamasaki, Katsuyuki Tomita, Kazuhiro Kato, Kouji Fukutani, Hiroyuki Sano, Yuji Tohda, and Eiji Shimizu.
    • Division of Medical Oncology and Molecular Respirology, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
    • Patient Prefer Adher. 2016 Jan 1; 10: 339344339-44.

    BackgroundAsthma guidelines suggest stepping-down of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) when asthma is stable.ObjectiveTo determine outcomes of stepping-down and prediction of outcome after stepping-down of ICSs in controlled adult asthma.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study on 21-81 year-old hospital-based outpatients with asthma in Japan. Protocol for stepping-down of ICSs was performed according to the GINA guideline. Failure/success of stepping-down is judged as occurring exacerbation or not for stepping-down of ICSs. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model for failed stepping-down, and then was validated by the leave-one-out cross-validation method. Our model of prediction score was calculated using receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) analysis. The Nelson-Aalen curve demonstrated time to failure of stepping-down of ICSs.ResultsA total of 126 patients with asthma attempted the stepping-down of ICSs according to the guideline. Of patients with follow-up, 97 (77.0%) of stepping-down attempts were successful. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, comorbidity with rhinitis/rhinosinusitis and phlegm grade were independent predictors of failed stepping-down of ICSs, with odds ratios of 3.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-13.3; P=0.04) and 1.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-11.5; P=0.04), respectively. These variables were then used to build a prediction score in terms of the prediction of failed stepping-down events. When the two variables were added to form the prediction score, the discriminative power of scores calculated by the prediction model using the AUC was 0.75 (range: 0.62-0.88) for naïve prediction and 0.72 (range: 0.60-0.86) after cross-validation. In the time-to-failure models, cumulative hazard ratio of failed stepping-down have fixed 1 year after stepping-down.ConclusionOur results suggest that comorbidity with rhinitis/rhinosinusitis and phlegm grade are imperative to predict failed stepping-down of ICSs in controlled patients with adult asthma.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.