• Mareia Talvitie, Magnus Jonsson, Joy Roy, and Rebecka Hultgren.
• Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
• Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3; 111 (1).

BackgroundIt is unclear whether women derive mortality benefit from early repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The aim of this study was to compare short- and mid-term mortality for women treated at small versus large diameters.MethodWomen receiving elective repair of AAA at small (49-54 mm) and large (≥55 mm) diameters from 2008 to 2022 were extracted from the Swedish National Registry for Vascular Surgery (n = 1642 women). The effect of diameter on 90-day, 1- and 3-year mortality was studied in logistic regression and propensity score models. Age, co-morbidities, smoking and repair modality were considered as confounders. Men (n = 9047) were analysed in parallel.ResultsSome 1642 women were analysed, of whom 34% underwent repair at small diameters (versus 52% of men). Women with small (versus large) AAAs were younger (73 versus 75 years, P < 0.001), and 63% of women in both size groups had endovascular repairs (P = 0.120). Mortality was 3.5% (90 days), 7.1% (1 year) and 15.8% (3 years), with no differences between the size strata. There was no consistent association between AAA size and mortality in multivariable models. Sex differences in mortality were almost entirely due to mortality in younger-than-average women versus men (3-year mortality: small AAAs 11.1% versus 7.3%, P < 0.030, or large 14.4% versus 10.7%, P < 0.038).ConclusionMortality in women is high and unaffected by AAA size at repair. The optimal threshold for women remains undefined. The higher rupture risk in women should not automatically translate into a lower, women-specific threshold.© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

18 keywords...

hide…