• Sharifah Shafinaz Binti Sharif-Abdullah, Mei Chan Chong, Surat Singh Surindar-Kaur, Shahrul Bahyah Kamaruzzaman, and Kwan Hoong Ng.
• Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
• Singapore Med J. 2016 May 1; 57 (5): 262266262-6.

IntroductionInadequate oral care has been implicated in the development of aspiration pneumonia in frail geriatric patients and is a major cause of mortality, due to the colonisation of microbes in vulnerable patients. This type of pneumonia has been associated with an increase in respiratory pathogens in the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of chlorhexidine compared to routine oral care in edentulous geriatric inpatients.MethodsA double-blind, parallel-group randomised controlled trial was carried out. The intervention group received oral care with chlorhexidine 0.2%, while the control group received routine oral care with thymol. Nurses provided oral care with assigned solutions of 20 mL once daily over seven days. Oral cavity assessment using the Brief Oral Health Status Examination form was performed before each oral care procedure. Data on medication received and the subsequent development of aspiration pneumonia was recorded. An oral swab was performed on Day 7 to obtain specimens to test for colonisation.ResultsThe final sample consisted of 35 (control) and 43 (intervention) patients. Chlorhexidine was effective in reducing oral colonisation compared to routine oral care with thymol (p < 0.001). The risk of oral bacterial colonisation was nearly three times higher in the thymol group compared to the chlorhexidine group.ConclusionThe use of chlorhexidine 0.2% significantly reduced oral colonisation and is recommended as an easier and more cost-effective alternative for oral hygiene.Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

31 keywords...

hide…