• Keith J Geraghty, Colum A O'Reilly, and Peter M Neary.
• Department of Surgery, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland. Keithgeraghty21@rcsi.com.
• Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Jun 1; 193 (3): 143114341431-1434.

BackgroundHaemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease is controversial due to fears over poor wound healing leading to proctectomy. We aim to review the available literature and establish the role of excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease.MethodsA review of the current scientific literature was conducted using Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials. Clinical trials from 2005 to present, reporting outcomes of excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease, were included. Review articles and case reports were excluded.ResultsA cohort of 67 patients across four studies was included in this review. There were no reported cases of proctectomy related to haemorrhoidectomy or poor wound healing. One patient (1.5%) had a non-healing wound post-operatively. Four (6%) cases of post-operative bleeding were identified, two (3%) patients were diagnosed with anal fissures and two (3%) were treated after developing perianal abscess post-procedure. There was one (1.5%) case of urinary retention, and one (1.5%) subject developed an anal stricture.ConclusionThe current available evidence suggests a role for excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease patients with well-controlled symptomatic disease, though further prospective analysis is certainly warranted. The preferred operation (open vs closed) remains unclear.Future RecommendationsFurther prospective trials are required to investigate the optimal approach to haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland.

15 keywords...

hide…