• Romayne Gallagher, Ramona Coelho, Philippe D Violette, K Sonu Gaind, and Harvey Max Chochinov.
• Division of Palliative Care, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
• J Palliat Med. 2023 Dec 1; 26 (12): 161016171610-1617.

AbstractThis report, signed by >170 scholars, clinicians, and researchers in palliative care and related fields, refutes the claims made by the previously published Medical Assistance in Dying, Palliative Care, Safety, and Structural Vulnerability. That report attempted to argue that structural vulnerability was not a concern in the provision of assisted dying (AD) by a selective review of evidence in medical literature and population studies. It claimed that palliative care has its own safety concerns, and that "misuse" of palliative care led to reports of wrongful death. We and our signatories do not feel that the conclusions reached are supported by the evidence provided in the contested report. The latter concluded that the logical policy response would be to address the root causes of structural vulnerability rather than restrict access to AD. Our report, endorsed by an international community of palliative care professionals, believes that public policy should aim to reduce structural vulnerability and, at the same time, respond to evidence-based cautions about AD given the potential harm.

11 keywords...

hide…