• Volkan Hanci, Büşra Otlu, and Ali Salih Biyikoğlu.
• Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Tukey.
• Crit. Care Med. 2024 Feb 1; 52 (2): e47e57e47-e57.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the readability of patient education materials (PEMs) on websites of intensive and critical care societies.Data SourcesWebsites of intensive and critical care societies, which are members of The World Federation of Intensive and Critical Care and The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.SettingCross-sectional observational, internet-based, website, PEMs, readability study.Study SelectionThe readability of the PEMs available on societies' sites was evaluated.Data ExtractionThe readability formulas used were the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Gunning Fog (GFOG).Data SynthesisOne hundred twenty-seven PEM from 11 different societies were included in our study. In the readability analysis of PEM, the FRES was 58.10 (48.85-63.77) (difficult), the mean FKGL and SMOG were 10.19 (8.93-11.72) and 11.10 (10.11-11.87) years, respectively, and the mean GFOG score was 12.73 (11.37-14.15) (very difficult). All readability formula results were significantly higher than the recommended sixth-grade level ( p < 0.001). All PEMs were above the sixth-grade level when the societies were evaluated individually according to all readability results ( p < 0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the sixth-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health, the readability of PEMs in intensive and critical care societies is relatively high. PEMs in intensive and critical care societies should be prepared with attention to recommendations on readability.Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…